Built on the corpus, not on a prompt

Argue it with a simulation of your judge.

A bench built from your judge's own hearings—their questions, their interruptions, their pet peeves—informed by every opinion your judge has ever published.

  • • Calibrated to your judge across 400+ unique, proprietary dimensions.
  • • Full coverage of the NY Supreme Court Commercial Division.
Argue a matter
Mootly, live
Your moment—the Court is waiting
THE COURT

Mr. La Borde, section 8.06 says the member can cause the company to redeem—the company, not the managers. And the redemption price is paid out of company assets. If the entity that writes the check isn't bound by the agreement that created it, who exactly owes your clients the price?

YOU

The company does, Your Honor, and their own draft papers concede it—the promissory notes name the company as the obligor. You cannot take the payment obligation and disclaim the process that fixes the amount…

THE COURT

Then take the harder one. If the appraisal undervalued the portfolio, every member's redemption price drops by the same percentage. Why isn't that the textbook derivative injury?

YOU

Because only my clients exercised the put. The injury runs to the members redeeming now—the company loses nothing, and…

Debrief · what the bench didn't accept
3 questions pressed · 1 answer held
"If the valuation hits every member proportionally, where is the injury that belongs to your clients alone — and what's your best case saying so?"
Pressed twice Drill this question
"Which provision of the operating agreement was actually breached—section and subsection?"
"You say the promissory notes name the company as the obligor. Where is that in the record—exhibit and page?"
No cite given Drill this question
Every debrief question launches a drill: the same judge re-opens the record on that single issue, hot bench, until the answer holds.
AM
Hon. Andrea Masley
NY Supreme Court · Commercial Division
Your opening, before she breaks in~60 words
Interruptions per hearing11.7—19% of answers cut
Her questionsone at a time, ~14 words
One question, then she moves57% of engagements
Share of the hearing she speaks33%
Takes the sides issue by issue54% of hearings
Offers counsel a last word13% of hearings
Bench pressure model
Measured from her own hearing transcripts, 2020–2023. Masley is not Cohen—the simulator knows the difference.
This judge. This case. This brief. Calibrated from real transcripts.
Hear the bench

Your courtroom, not a chatbot

From an actual argument with the Justice Cohen simulator. Opposing counsel is laying out his argument, and the Justice Cohen simulator does what Justice Cohen has done in hundreds of hearings—presses further.

Hit play and watch the transcript build as they speak, exactly as it does in the courtroom.

Live hearing audio 0:41
Press play
The bench is Mootly's Justice Joel M. Cohen simulation. Simulated voices, generated live during a real practice session. No court recording is used. Actual names replaced.
The debrief

Every weak answer becomes a drill

After the hearing: the questions you were asked, which answers held, where the record contradicts you—with the judge's own prior questions quoted beside yours. One click re-opens the hearing on the single question you fumbled, at a hotter bench.

Debrief
"Isn't your damages theory just the contract claim in tort clothing? What's the independent duty?"
"Where in the record is the demand, or the allegation that demand would have been futile?"
The Court asked something like this before—the real question, from a real hearing on a motion just like yours, is quoted in your debrief.
13,000+ bench exchanges indexed—your judge's real questions, retrieved into every hearing
Built on the corpus, not on a prompt
10,000+Transcripts in the corpus
3 liveSimulators fully calibrated
5 in queueSimulators in active calibration
WeeklyNew transcripts added
How it works

Four steps to a sharper argument

01

Pick your judge

Choose the named judge you're appearing before. If your judge isn't live yet, fall back to a court-style general bench calibrated to the forum.

02

Upload your brief

PDF or DOCX, both sides. We extract the tension map—where the briefs actually disagree—automatically. Takes about thirty seconds.

03

Argue in real time

The judge pushes on the weak points this judge actually pushes on, and quotes your record back to you.

04

Get a transcript-grounded debrief

Each weakness comes with a citation to a real prior proceeding where this judge ruled the same way. Not opinion—record.

What sets Mootly apart

Generic AI judges can't push back on what they don't know

Generic AI judges

Trained on legal reasoning in general. Has never read a Masley transcript.

→

Court-style benches

Calibrated to a forum's tone (SCOTUS-style, Circuit-style). Still no specific judge.

→
Who it's for

Built for the practitioners who can't afford a surprise at the lectern

Advocacy programs

Law schools

Give every student unlimited reps in front of the bench they'll actually compete against. Coach dashboards review every session.

Appellate & commercial practice

Solo & small-firm

The first time you hear your argument out loud should not be at the lectern. Run it three times against the judge before Friday's hearing.

Step up to the lectern

The court doesn't care if it's your first argument or your fortieth. Walk in ready.

Request a demo